Manderson faces contempt of court motion; date set for peace bond case

In the latest chapter of an ongoing legal battle involving two senior county officials, Guelph blogger Bill Manderson says he has been served with a contempt of court motion.

The 74-year-old retired en­gi­neer says he plans to attend Superior Court on March 9 and make a statement in his de­fence.

Late last week he had not yet had time to review the stack of files that came with the notice on Feb. 25, but Man­derson said the inference is that he violated the injunction issued last February by Judge Cas Herold.

That injunction was issued as a temporary measure until a trial is complete in the case of a $2.4-million libel lawsuit filed against Manderson last year by county councillor Brad Whit­combe and county Chief Ad­mi­nistrative Officer Scott Wilson.

Recently lawyers for Mc­Carthy Tetrault, the firm  representing Wilson and Whitc­ombe, filed an amended statement of claim seeking just $3 in damages, as well as a permanent injunction.

The current injunction prohibits Manderson from posting anything on his website, smelly-welly.com, that refers to the two county officials as criminals, liars, or mentally ill, or that compares them to Nazis.

In an interview last week, McCarthy Tetrault lawyer Chris Wayland said he believes there is material on Mander­son’s website that does violate the current injunction and hinted further legal action may be the result.

“We may take steps with respect to that,” Wayland said, adding he did not want to comment further at the time.

Date set for peace bond case

On Feb. 26, Manderson was back in Guelph court for a parallel  peace bond proceeding that was first initiated by Wil­son and Whitcombe in Janu­ary 2009.

If granted, the peace bond will require Man­derson to keep the peace for 12 months or face criminal charges. The complaints stem from alleged written threats made by Manderson in over 150 letters to county officials, as well as on his website.

The peace bond proceedings have been delayed no fewer than five times and last month were set for early December. But Stewart Taylor, Senior Justice of the Peace for Onta­rio’s western region, intervened and told the parties to return to court last week to try and schedule the matter for an earlier date.

Presiding Justice of the Peace Walter Rojek suggested March 16, but private prosecutor Sharon Wilmot, of Mc­Carthy Tetrault, said that date would not work for her firm due to another trial she expects will run from March to June.

Lawyer Gregory Oakes, who  appeared on behalf of Manderson’s lawyer David Doney (who is recovering from surgery), said the date did not work for the defence either.

After some discussion and a brief recess, Rojek said he was pleased to announce the case would proceed on Aug. 3 and continue, if necessary, the following two days.

“That’s the best we can do,” he said to Wilmot. “Either you take it or walk away from this case.”

Outside the court, Man­der­son said he is “ecstatic” with the August date because it will allow the case to proceed be­fore this fall’s municipal elections.

 

Comments