County tries again for antifortification bylaw approval in municipalities

County council will send yet another antiforti­fication bylaw to the seven low­er tier municipalities for ap­proval.

Councillor Lynda White, the recently elected Police Ser­vices Board chairman, told council Jan. 28 that the muni­cipalities “can do with it what they wish to do.”

But, she added, “I hope every mayor and councillor realize that the importance and safety this bylaw will bring to your communities.”

The bylaw is basically aim­ed at preventing outlaw motor­cycle clubs from creating forti­fied clubhouses to keep out pol­ice in case of a search war­rant. The county has been working on it for several years, with several municipalities re­jecting it at the request of their building inspectors, who are reluctant to have to enforce it.

Councillor Mike Broom­head asked that the recom­mendation be separated from the rest of the Police Service Board minutes when it comes to a vote.

He said, “Our council has said no. Our employees, as a group, are still opposed.”

Broomhead said that from what he has read, the county just needs one person to en­force the bylaw. “Get one per­son … and Wellington North will have it. We will not pass this. I’m starting to feel this is getting shoved down our throats.”

Councillor David Anderson said there had been some discussion with his staff, about the board deciding to order an inspection of a property.

White said that clause has been removed from the bylaw.

Chief Administrative Offi­cer Scott Wilson said that all the concerns were addressed, and five of the seven muni­cipalities responded favourably to the bylaw, and to the deletion of that clause.

“It had the Police Services Board being responsible if a building or structure was in vio­lation of the bylaw,” Wilson said. “Even an officer couldn’t act without permission of the Police Services Board. We need to send this back to the CBOs [Chief Building Offi­cials].”

Wilson added, “It’s not my position to jam this down any­body’s throat. This bylaw is ac­tually seen as weaker than anyone’s in Ontario. It’s up to the individual municipalities.”

White told council that if a strong bylaw is in place, those undesirables who might want fortified buildings will see it is there and likely move to a locale where no such restric­tions exist.

“If they see this place has one, they will think twice about moving into our county,” she said. “I hope our municipalities take a good look at this.

“If a motorcycle club moves in [because there is no bylaw] I would be unhappy,” she con­cluded.

Councillor Lou Maieron said the bylaw can be consid­ered “a preventative tool” and asked if all municipalities need to agree.

Ross-Zuj said the bylaw will be a local one.

Broomhead said the prob­lem can be easily solved if the county can find a single person to enforce it.

“It doesn’t happen [a call for inspection] very often. It’s been used three times [in On­tario] over several years. Just find one person to do it.”

When council voted to circulate the bylaw and it carri­ed, with Broomhead opposed.

 

 

Comments