Bad weather and politics delayed progress on dam

Last week’s column out­lin­ed some of the events preced­ing the construction of the Conestogo Dam, from the first conception of the project up to the end of 1953.

During the early months of 1954 progress on the project stagnated. During spring, the Grand River Conservation Com­mission had agents in the field purchasing land that would be under the reservoir. But that was the extent of activity.

One consequence of the planned dam was a renewed sense of community in the old hamlet of Hollen. Members of the congregation made plans for a big anniversary service in June. They invited a former minister, Rev. T.W. Hazelwood, to preside, and contacted as many expatriates as they could locate who had been members of both the Presbyterian and Methodist churches. Some fear­ed that this might be the last anniversary for the church.

Other than some land pur­chases, there was not much ac­tion by the GRCC. There was talk of a start to work in the fall, but it soon became obvious that nothing would happen until 1955. There was lots of talk, and during the summer the provincial government issued a booklet describing the project.

On Oct. 15, most residents of the lower Conestogo Valley and points downstream wished that the dam had was already in place. That was the date of Hur­ricane Hazel. In Peel and Maryborough, the storm dump­ed five to seven inches of rain on fields that were already waterlogged. Hundreds of houses suffered flooding, and local volunteer groups led re­lief efforts for those who could no longer use their homes.

Whether by coincidence or not, a few days after the hurri­cane GRCC chairman Marcel Pequegnat, of Kitchener, an­nounced that a formal call for tenders would be issued for building the dam, with a six week interval to allow con­trac­tors to prepare their bids. The dam would be built during 1955 and 1956, he stated. The GRCC’s engineers had rework­ed the figures again, and the cost was now $5,400,000, up from the $4-million estimate of 1952, and more than double the original projection made in 1948.

By then, the GRCC engi­neers had drawn new maps to show the roads, almost all in Maryborough Township, that would be closed and relocated, and new ones that would be built around the reservoir. The new road map infuriated Mary­borough Reeve Phil Rowland and his council. Parts of the township would be virtually isolated from the rest.    

The GRCC opened the tend­ers for the construction of the dam in December. Their nod went to C.A. Pitts Con­struc­tion, a firm experienced in major projects across Canada. Pitts had recently completed dams, mining, and railway projects in the Lynn Lake area of Northern Manitoba. The firm announced that it would start work as soon as the spring 1955 floods receded.

Meanwhile, during the early months of 1955, Maryborough council was busy, both prepar­ing for the dam and continuing their objections to it. On March 3, they met with affected school trustees. They agreed that SS3 at Hollen would be closed, and the SS4 school would be relocated. The GRCC readily agreed to move the school to a higher site.

The fury of Reeve Rowland and his councillors was reduc­ed somewhat by an announce­ment when the GRCC stated that payments in lieu of taxes of $7,900 would be made to Peel and Maryborough. They were already making similar payments to West Garafraxa for the Shand Dam and Lake Belwood.

True to their word, C.A. Pitts employees were on the ground in numbers in April. Through the winter they had hired subcontractors to cut trees and clear brush in the construction area. By mid April, Pitts had set up a con­struction office, built a two-circuit telephone line to the Drayton exchange, and brought in the first of a fleet of trucks that were soon hauling materi­als to the site. Much of the material came in by rail, to the Canadian Pacific station, at Linwood.

Peel Reeve W.A. Walker and his council spent much of their April 4 meeting discus­sing the road closures and relocations required by the new dam. They passed a motion asking the GRCC to relocate and widen the Peel-Mary­bor­ough townline road.

Preparatory work was well under way by the time of the sod-turning ceremony on May 30.

The event followed a morn­ing meeting of the GRCC, at which Drayton Reeve A.E. Andrews reminded his fellow representatives that the dam would not solve all the flooding problems on the Conestogo. Officials stated that they were fully aware of the problems in Drayton, and that they intended to address them as part of the project.

The ceremony produced a rare moment of harmony. Pres­ent were several provincial officials and politicians. There would be a provincial general election in 10 days, and the Frost government wanted ev­ery­one to be aware that Ontario was picking up 37.5% of the bill.

During the summer of 1955 Hollen became something of tourist destination, as visitors caught a last glimpse of the hamlet that would soon be partially submerged. Most went on to the construction site, where huge scrapers were shap­ing the dam.

In October, Peel council made final arrangements with the GRCC for the realignment of a couple of roads. Reaching such an agreement with Mary­borough would not be so simple.

When the GRCC met in February 1956 to review the progress of the previous year, the mood was glum. There were already some cost over­runs, and the project had barely been started. Officials and board members were quarrel­ing with everyone: the federal government over grants, with Wellington County council and Maryborough Township over roads, and with the Grand Valley Conservation Authority over the post-construction man­age­ment of the site.

It was not the first time that the GRCC and the GVCA had bumped heads over their juris­dictions and mandates. Dis­putes would continue until the two bodies were merged a dec­ade later to form The Grand River Conservation Authority.

The realignment of school section boundaries was a major task for Maryborough. The township had already decided to close the school at Hollen. At the same time, there was grow­ing support for school consoli­dation, a move strongly sup­port­ed by Reeve Rowland. Dis­cussions on those issues con­ti­nued through 1956 and into 1957.

At the construction site, the C.A. Pitts crews encountered new problems. The firm had hoped to complete the earth fill and all the concrete work on the dam by late fall, but an extraordinarily wet summer was frustrating their work with high water levels in the river and waterlogged soil. Floods following rainstorms washed portions of the earth fill away several times, carrying thous­ands of cubic feet of fill downstream. At the beginning of August, it was obvious that all the earthmoving would not be done that year. There were also unanticipated problems. Labour disruptions in the steel industry delayed deliveries of materials.

Poor construction condi­tions persisted into September. By then, there were new prob­lems on the political front. The Grand River Conservation Com­mission could not agree with county council on the new road system around the lake. As well, there were schisms within the GRCC. The road system had been more or less sorted out in 1955, but new appointees to the GRCC were unhappy with those arrangements. The squabbling encouraged Mary­bor­ough council to raise a fresh round of objections.

Reeve Norm Drimmie, of Elora, had been county warden in 1955, and continued to sit as a member of the GRCC. He claimed that the Ontario Min­istry of Planning and Develop­ment was “holding up the work.”

In October, county coun­cillors decided to ap­proach the local MPs and MPPs to solve the impasse. The two senior levels of govern­ment were providing most of the funding for the dam.

At that point, one of the major issues was a culvert and large fill de­manded by the county, with an estimated cost of $300,000.

Pequegnat, the GRCC chairman, tried to put the best face on a deteriorating situa­tion, both with construction and with the political disputes. He announced that tenders would be let for the necessary road work in early 1957, and that the provincial government would take a more active role in settling the various disputes.

Next week Pushing the project to completion.

 

 

Stephen Thorning

Comments