Dear Editor:
RE: Dual roles don’t put Adams in conflict, Nov. 17.
Having run in the last town council election I found the majority of candidates to be sincere and committed and the overall mood was one of collegiality. I also learned that some candidates had conflicts in their personal interests verses that of their role as councillor, there were personality conflicts, some misrepresentations and backstabbing (which will colour my perception of future councils actions) however none of which being newsworthy.
I found your article on the potential conflict of Jennifer Adams as to her role as a newly-elected town councillor and her new job as county clerk to be informative and balanced.
The article’s impetus seemed to be contained in the statement that her roles “raised some eyebrows in the community, with some believing it shouldn’t be allowed” however did not cite any sources(s).
I believe it is important to cite these sources. Were there calls to the reporter from concerned citizens, letters to the editor or a single source seeking to raise the issue? Given the dysfunction of the last council and the resultant innuendos and uninformed perceptions I feel it is important to be clear on the source of these type of concerns in order to avoid a repeat of the last two council terms.
I would like to state that I had never met Jennifer Adams prior to this election and that I found her to be forthright, sincere and generous with her time. I believe that her commitment and knowledge will be a valuable asset to both the town council and to the county.
Raymond Trafford,
Fergus
*Editor’s note: The Advertiser received several inquiries about Adams’ situation, both at our office and via social media.