Erin releases employee severance details after two-year battle with newspaper

ERIN – After almost two years of outright refusals, conflicting explanations and failed legal arguments, the Town of Erin has now decided to provide employee severance information sought by the Advertiser.

In a YouTube video posted to the town’s Facebook page at just after 6pm on Sept. 7, clerk Lisa Campion announced severances paid to terminated Erin employees from Jan. 1, 2012 to Dec. 31, 2017 totalled $577,719.

She also stated “staff have conducted an additional search and can confirm that no records have been destroyed.” 

Previously, Erin officials suggested records “would have been destroyed after three years” – even though town policy states six years –  but also declared they “cannot confirm whether or not records were destroyed.”

In her 100-second video, Campion states the town is “reviewing our records management practices, providing further training to all staff and implementing a new and electronic data records management system which will create efficiencies in retrieving our data in a more effective way.”

Campion’s official written response to the Advertiser stated the town’s additional search, which “took over 50 hours,” uncovered 20 records related to the newspaper’s Freedom of Information (FOI) request.

The town denied access to all 20 records “on various grounds”- mostly related to privacy issues.

Campion stated that although “there is no obligation on the town” to calculate the single dollar figure sought by the newspaper, she can confirm the amount for 2012 to 2017 is $577,719.

Erin’s six-year total is more than three times the next highest total for municipalities in Wellington County – and greater than the next three highest combined (Erin’s total is the only one that includes all of 2017).

The six other lower-tier municipalities in the county provided their totals to the Advertiser within months – and most much earlier – thus avoiding a newspaper appeal to the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario (IPC). 

Their figures (from Jan. 1, 2012 to Aug. 11, 2017) were:

– Centre Wellington $171,225;

– Guelph-Eramosa $154,014

– Mapleton $174,486;

– Minto $48,172;

– Puslinch $2,448; and

– Wellington North $106,611.

The Advertiser was denied an opportunity to speak to CAO Nathan Hyde – and indeed any other Erin staff member – about the matter.

“[FOI] requests are handled through the clerk’s office,” stated communications officer Jessica Spina in a Sept. 9 email. 

She added “staff are respecting the process and will await further communications from the IPC.”

Town ‘message’ key

Asked why the town would release the severance information via social media, Mayor Allan Alls told the Advertiser, “We were trying to get our message out, instead of the one you guys might like to write.”

Alls stressed members of council were not involved in the FOI/IPC process, noting, “it’s the clerk who makes decisions on privacy issues.”

Asked if, in hindsight, he would have handled the situation differently, Alls replied, “Probably.”

Regarding the timing of the release of the total severance cost, he said, “Up to now, the staff could not find the records, so we couldn’t say anything. None of it would be accurate.”

Alls added, “The payroll system changed in between all this going on. So although records weren’t destroyed, our people had trouble finding the information that was there.” 

Erin’s six-year total is the highest of all lower-tier municipalities in the county likely because, “There were some pretty high-paid people, even before my council, that were let go,” he explained.

Alls acknowledged that releasing the municipality’s “gross number,” showing the total severance cost over several years, does not constitute an invasion of privacy.

Background

IPC adjudicator Jessica Kowalski told the town on Aug. 9 that she was “not satisfied” with its response to her interim order directing Erin officials to conduct further searches for severance records.

Kowalski gave the town until Sept. 6 to explain  “when, and what, responsive records were destroyed” and to clarify a discrepancy between town policy (stating records are to be retained for six years) and an affidavit from Campion (stating records are kept for three years).

The additional searches were ordered after the IPC rejected the initial town submissions filed by Bay Street law firm Aird and Berlis that argued the newspaper’s request was for a single document that does not exist – and the town is not required to create a record.

The Advertiser maintained town officials should have known that fulfilling the FOI request would require a search for several records/documents.

The original FOI request was filed in the fall of 2017 as part of an Advertiser request to all Wellington County municipalities for the total amount of severances paid to terminated employees from Jan. 1, 2012 to Aug. 11, 2017.

The request was made in response to what appeared to be a large number of firings by some area municipalities.

Erin was the only one of eight municipalities that refused to provide the information. The newspaper then appealed Erin’s decision to the IPC.

– With files from Phil Gravelle

Editor

There are 2 comments.

Comments